I am a true lover on the H4831 powder. I get great velocity and accuracy away from any caliber I've tried using it in. From your twenty five-06 up to the 338 it really is my drop by powder of preference. I attempt all sorts of powders when Doing the job up loads, though the H4831 usually appears to come out on best for accuracy and velocity when the situation is of your 06 course or much larger.
They are precisely the same thing, but H4831 sc is cut shorter so it's going to pack right into a circumstance less difficult then the normal, and in some instances like our 7mm rem mag it makes it possible for us so as to add more powder then just the normal H4831.
It is probably that no more discussion is necessary, where scenario we advocate starting off a brand new thread. If nonetheless you really feel your response is required you are able to nonetheless do so.
Minnesota H4831SC is my drop by from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the small I have still left for drop 2021. I would commence low and perform your way up, dependant upon what load data you evaluate for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
Novice to reloading. This is going to be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I had been capable of get my hands on a pair kilos of h4831.
I'm sure, rough occasions. H4831SC will certainly perform, I just did not like the situation density when loaded extended. I don't recall powder cost off the very best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which happens to be where by I usually goal being. Within your case utilizing what you might have (and what I ought to have completed) I would begin with the top of the bearing surface area with the bullet correct with the shoulder/neck junction, h4831 vs h4831sc and flirt with extending seating depths from there as you find a velocity node.
You could have to create a number of more posts to have cleared to do PM's. When you get to that standing I would write-up in the classified reloading part to view if any one is near you to get a trade.
The SC or SSC specified powders Generally enable for bigger load density, so that you can commonly get a tiny bit far more powder within a provided scenario when using compressed loads. Usage of a drop tube can further more improve this advantage.
I've observed the exact opposite to become genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally correct powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
It is humorous how over time loading many unique cartridges in many various rifles which i have never attained suitable conclusion success with h4831sc H-4831 or maybe the short-cut version.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are fully distinctive powders, with IMR 4831 becoming substantially more rapidly compared to the Hodgdon variants. Will not take care of them as precisely the same powder, because they most absolutely are usually not.
Like Everybody said, the SC means “small cut” and it is a little bit h4831sc load data much easier to meter. Makes you concern why they might even now make the regular a single.
I am aware the H4831SC presents an improved load density But I believe I've ample room in my circumstance for the conventional H4831.
This seems like a great place to divulge a bit more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 especially...I the moment experienced a pound of H4831SC sit within the shelf for many decades. It was acquired before Hodgdon started publicizing the "Severe" line of powders, of which the H4831s are a part.